Virtue signaling isn’t bad in itself, the problem is that people have no idea what virtue is

Good point

Not a good point. People know what virtue is, they simply disagree about it. Still insisting on pushing your narrative as if it’s self-evident. Now imagine what happens when everyone does that and it differs from each other. No narrative wins, but an amalgam of them.

People can’t learn when you don’t present the subtleties in your thinking beyond what they’re already accustomed to. Learning happens as a matter of novelty, not repetition. Well, there are different types of learning, but you’ll have to guess what I mean absent any questions

nah, repetition is way more important. you are fractally wrong. There is such a thing as virtue and it doesn’t matter if people disagree, any more than it matters if they disagree over whether fire is hot

For you to confidently tell me there’s such a thing as virtue, you’d have to first be more intelligent than me. Given your simplistic notion of the world and its lacking relativism, that’s a very bold assumption on your part Do tell, how did you find out there’s virtue?

Because they can’t access magical worlds like “racism” to win any argument I legit think RW people are becoming smarter than Libs